Humans' recognition of kin depends on environmental cues that other humans can manipulate.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Cite this claim
Steven Pinker, “Humans' recognition of kin depends on environmental cues that other humans can manipulate.” (said 18 June 2012). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_a5992a96d4e3, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_a5992a96d4e3
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Steven Pinker
-
Mostly true
“The studies of human persuadability, malleability, show that there’s just so much unpredictability and chaos in a human that this may be a quixotic pursuit.”
-
Mostly true
“What they do is they coordinate on the full moon.”
-
Mixed
“So that’s an unresolved controversy in the cognitive psychology literature”
-
Mostly true
“Females on average perform better than males on a 'theory of mind' test across 57 countries.”
-
Resolved true
“John Ioannidis, among the savviest epidemiologists (his 2005 article alerted us to the replicability crisis)”
John Ioannidis published a 2005 article that alerted scientists to the replicability crisis.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.