The Wall Street Journal published a piece on self-supervised learning involving Kyunghyun Cho and Yann LeCun.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
TRUE: the Wall Street Journal published an article on or shortly before 14 August 2020 whose subject is self-supervised learning and which features or quotes both Kyunghyun Cho and Yann LeCun. MOSTLY TRUE: such a WSJ article exists, but one of the two is only mentioned rather than quoted, or the main topic is closely related (for example, unsupervised learning or AI learning without labels). MOSTLY FALSE: a WSJ article exists, but it involves only one of the two, or self-supervised learning is only a minor aside. FALSE: there was no WSJ piece on this topic involving either of them in that period, for example because the piece appeared in a different outlet.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (1)
-
E1 Self-supervised learning: The plan to make deep learning data-efficient - TechTalks TechTalks · 23 March 2020
“My suggestion is to use unsupervised learning, or I prefer to call it self-supervised learning because the algorithms we use are really akin to supervised learning, which is basically learning to fill in the blanks”
Reasoning
The only evidence, E1, is a TechTalks article from March 2020 that quotes LeCun on self-supervised learning. It is not a Wall Street Journal piece and does not mention Kyunghyun Cho. Nothing in the evidence shows whether the WSJ published an article on self-supervised learning around 14 August 2020 featuring both men, and nothing shows that it did not.
Cite this claim
Yann LeCun, “The Wall Street Journal published a piece on self-supervised learning involving Kyunghyun Cho and Yann LeCun.” (said 14 August 2020). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_9bb932584c02, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_9bb932584c02
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Yann LeCun
-
Resolved true
““It’s AI for the physical world, so it’s not language-related,” LeCun said.”
AMI Labs' work is AI for the physical world and is not language-related.
-
Resolved true
““It’s systems that understand the real world, like a manufacturing plant or turbojet engine.””
-
Mostly true
“Full house for my lecture hosted by the Center of Mathematical Sciences and Applications at Harvard yesterday.”
-
Resolved true
“Max is a professor at MIT. His job, like mine, is to increase the intelligence of students and other humans.”
-
Resolved true
“A recent series of 8 lectures on deep learning that I gave at Collège de France in Paris.”
Yann LeCun gave a recent series of 8 lectures on deep learning at Collège de France in Paris.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.