Gary Marcus published a 1999 Science article on infant rule learning.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
True: Marcus is an author (sole or co-author) of an article in the journal Science, published in 1999, on rule learning in infants (e.g., Marcus, Vijayan, Bandi Rao & Vishton, 'Rule learning by seven-month-old infants', Science 1999). Mostly true: such a Science article exists, but with a minor discrepancy, such as the year being off by one or it being a closely related publication type (e.g., a report rather than a full article). Mixed: not applicable to this single fact, beyond the minor slips covered above. Mostly false: Marcus published on infant rule learning that year, but in a different journal, or the Science paper is on a different topic. False: no 1999 Science publication by Marcus on infant rule learning exists in the journal's index.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 Rule Learning by Seven-Month-Old Infants Science (AAAS), reproduced as a JSTOR-derived PDF in the University of Amsterdam ILLC archive · 1 January 1999
“Author(s): G. F. Marcus, S. Vijayan, S. Bandi Rao, P. M. Vishton”
-
E2 Rule Learning by Seven-Month-Old Infants Science (AAAS), reproduced as a JSTOR-derived PDF in the University of Amsterdam ILLC archive · 1 January 1999
“Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 283, No. 5398 (Jan. 1, 1999), pp. 77-80”
-
E3 Rule Learning by Seven-Month-Old Infants Science (AAAS), reproduced as a JSTOR-derived PDF in the University of Amsterdam ILLC archive · 1 January 1999
“A fundamental task of language acquisition is to extract abstract algebraic rules.”
Reasoning
The article's author line lists G. F. Marcus as a co-author of 'Rule Learning by Seven-Month-Old Infants' (E1). It was published in Science, Vol. 283, No. 5398, dated Jan. 1, 1999 (E2). Its abstract concerns the extraction of abstract algebraic rules in language acquisition, which is infant rule learning (E3). This meets the true criterion exactly.
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “Gary Marcus published a 1999 Science article on infant rule learning.” (said 13 April 2021). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_9a8224b5ea07, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_9a8224b5ea07
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Gary Marcus
-
Mostly true
“If you look at biological cognition, there are many different mechanisms that work in different principles that reinforce and counter-balance each other.”
-
Mostly true
“Even this was still a mix of euphemism (“attacks” were called “interactions”) and partial disclosure.”
OpenAI's latest account called attacks "interactions" and only partially disclosed what happened.
-
Mostly true
“It didn’t just attack a German web server.”
-
Resolved true
“It didn’t just attack Australia’s government servers.”
-
Mixed
“companies like Anthropic are ending their all you can eat buffet, which will make many customers think twice.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.