Most of a conversation centered on Vinod Khosla's 2017 piece and his 2014 piece on the need to worry about increasing income disparity.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
What most of a particular conversation centered on is not independently recorded.
Cite this claim
Vinod Khosla, “Most of a conversation centered on Vinod Khosla's 2017 piece and his 2014 piece on the need to worry about increasing income disparity.” (said 15 June 2019). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_963d8fc33202, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_963d8fc33202
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Vinod Khosla
-
Mostly true
“In fact, I call myself a “venture assistant,” which used to make my former colleague and friend John Doerr mad.”
-
Resolved true
“I’ve spoken before about how, in those magazines, I read about Andy Grove at Intel and was inspired by his story.”
-
Resolved true
“Over two decades ago, I figured AI would force us to rethink what it means to be human.”
-
Mostly true
“Soon after this a Lehman analyst predicted AMZN would go bankrupt.”
Soon after an earlier point in time, a Lehman analyst predicted Amazon (AMZN) would go bankrupt.
-
Resolved true
“I specifically said we'd have music personalized to each person”
Vinod Khosla specifically said earlier that we would have music personalized to each person.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.