Brooks's September 2025 blog post said the danger of a walking robot is roughly proportional to the cube of its weight.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Cite this claim
Rodney Brooks, “Brooks's September 2025 blog post said the danger of a walking robot is roughly proportional to the cube of its weight.” (said September 2025). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_8a86155fb8ad, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_8a86155fb8ad
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Rodney Brooks
-
Mostly true
“But no, I had no idea it would be LLMs at the time of my correct prediction that something big would appear.”
-
Mostly true
“I have spent my whole professional life developing robots and my companies have built more of them than anyone else”
-
Resolved true
“I bought my first electric car this year.”
-
Mixed
“they are safe in the presence of humans.”
The warehouse mobile robots built by Brooks's current startup are safe in the presence of humans.
-
Mostly true
“I have reported about particular rides, that I or others have taken, when I think that the vehicles have done something for which a human driver would somehow be sanctioned if they had done the same…”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.