A website with a .eth or other crypto domain can now hold a crypto wallet as well as metadata.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
True: as of 25 December 2019, crypto naming systems (ENS .eth, or Unstoppable Domains .crypto) supported, in deployed form, a single domain name carrying both cryptocurrency wallet address records and website or content metadata (e.g. contenthash or IPFS records). Mostly true: this was supported but limited, such as only in one system, only for ETH addresses, or only through some resolvers or browsers. Mixed: wallet-address records and website or content records existed, but not usable together on one domain at that date. Mostly false: the feature was only announced or in testnet at that date, so 'now' overstates it. False: no crypto domain system supported wallet address records for domains by that date.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 Linking DNS with blockchain-based ENS records - cdn.icann.org ICANN (slides by Brantly Millegan, ENS / True Names LTD)
“Address: Ethereum address - Content: IPFS or Swarm hash”
-
E2 Linking DNS with blockchain-based ENS records - cdn.icann.org ICANN (slides by Brantly Millegan, ENS / True Names LTD)
“Native integration in Opera browser”
-
E3 contenthash field for ENS | Ethereum Improvement Proposals Ethereum Improvement Proposals (ERCS)
“you can also find this smart contract deployed on: - Mainnet : 0xd3ddccdd3b25a8a7423b5bee360a42146eb4baf3”
-
E4 Introduction¶ ENS documentation (ens.readthedocs.io)
“ENS’s job is to map human-readable names like ‘alice.eth’ to machine-readable identifiers such as Ethereum addresses, content hashes, and metadata.”
Reasoning
E1 is an ICANN slide deck whose URL dates it to 24 June 2019. It lists an Ethereum address record and an IPFS/Swarm content record as ENS record types, so one .eth name could carry both a wallet address and site content. E2 says ENS had native integration in the Opera browser. E3 and E4 show that contenthash was deployed on mainnet and that ENS maps names to both addresses and content, though neither source is dated. The evidence shows support in ENS, with Ethereum address records alongside content records; it does not show support in other naming systems or for other coin types, and the criteria count support limited in this way as mostly true.
Cite this claim
Balaji Srinivasan, “A website with a .eth or other crypto domain can now hold a crypto wallet as well as metadata.” (said 25 December 2019). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_87c9d6a6c2e9, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_87c9d6a6c2e9
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Balaji Srinivasan
-
Mostly false
“Electric vehicles now fill up roughly as fast as gas.”
Electric vehicles now fill up roughly as fast as gasoline vehicles.
-
Mixed
“It's really the keys to your car itself. The digital signature starts the engine.”
The keys are the keys to the car itself: a digital signature starts the engine.
-
Mostly true
“this door can also be secured with an onchain smart lock. That means the door to your house can be secured by crypto.”
Doors, including house doors, can be secured with an onchain smart lock controlled by crypto.
-
Mostly true
“in the late ’90s, and probably the early 2000s, people talked about the so-called convergence device.”
-
Resolved true
“Sergey Brin, many years ago, remarked that it was emasculating to do that.”
Sergey Brin remarked many years ago that staring down at a phone is emasculating.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.