ClaimsGary Marcus

“Microsoft put out a press release yesterday, masquerading as science, that claimed that GPT-4 was “an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system”.”

Gary Marcus, Substack author 24 March 2023 The Sparks of AGI? Or the End of Science? (Marcus on AI) archived copy

Factual AI capabilities

Gary Marcus said that on 2023-03-23 Microsoft had put out what he called a press release masquerading as science, which claimed that GPT-4 was an early (yet still incomplete) version of an AGI system.

Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

What would count as true or false

The substantive claim is that around 23 March 2023 Microsoft (including its researchers) published a document stating that GPT-4 could be seen as 'an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system'. Calling it a 'press release masquerading as science' is Marcus's characterisation, not a factual test. True: a Microsoft-authored document with that statement was made public on 2023-03-23, or a little before. Mostly true: such a document with that statement exists and was released within a few days of 23 March 2023 (for example on 22 March), or it is a research paper rather than a formal press release, with the substance otherwise as stated. Mostly false: Microsoft published such a document, but the wording materially differs (for example it does not describe GPT-4 as an early version of AGI), or it was released well away from that date. False: no such Microsoft document making that statement existed.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (4)

  1. E1 Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4 ar5iv (arXiv HTML rendering of arXiv:2303.12712)

    “Given the breadth and depth of GPT-4’s capabilities, we believe that it could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.”
  2. E2 Microsoft Researchers Claim GPT-4 Is Showing "Sparks" of AGI Futurism · 23 March 2023

    ““Given the breadth and depth of GPT-4’s capabilities,” they continue, “we believe that it could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.””
  3. E3 Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) Is A Very Human Hallucination Forbes (Gil Press, Senior Contributor) · 28 March 2023

    “Microsoft researchers reported on March 22 the results of their investigation of an “early version” of GPT-4, claiming that it exhibits “more general intelligence than previous AI models.””
  4. E4 Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4 | CenterConsulting CenterConsulting · 22 March 2023

    ““Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4” was submitted to arXiv on March 22, 2023 by a Microsoft Research team led by Sebastien Bubeck, with co-authors including Eric Horvitz and Yin Tat Lee.”

Reasoning

E1 and E2 confirm that a document by Microsoft researchers, "Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4", says GPT-4 "could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system", matching the quoted wording. E3 and E4 date its release to 22 March 2023 on arXiv, one day before the date the claim implies. It was also a research paper rather than a formal press release. Under the criteria, those two differences make the verdict mostly true.

Cite this claim

Gary Marcus, “Gary Marcus said that on 2023-03-23 Microsoft had put out what he called a press release masquerading as science, which claimed that GPT-4 was an early (yet still incomplete) version of an AGI system.” (said 24 March 2023). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_80e488884e68, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_80e488884e68

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Gary Marcus, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Gary Marcus

  1. Mostly true Factual January 2026
    “Reviews by Joanna Stern and Marques Brownle of one early prototype were damning;”

    Reviews by Joanna Stern and Marques Brownlee of one early humanoid robot prototype were damning.

  2. Mostly true Factual January 2026
    “Many would agree we have reached a point of diminishing returns for scaling; faith in scaling as a route to AGI has dissipated.”

    Many would agree the AI field has reached a point of diminishing returns from scaling, and faith in scaling as a route to AGI has dissipated.

  3. Mostly true Factual January 2026
    “Despite all the hype, agents didn’t turn out to be reliable.”

    AI agents did not turn out to be reliable in 2025.

  4. Mixed Factual 2025
    “but the systems don’t have the knowledge graph to do that.”

    Current AI systems lack the knowledge graph needed to handle easy facts like those on the first page of Wikipedia.

  5. Resolved true Factual 2025
    “Hasn’t worked so far. That’s for sure.”

    Bolting extra components onto an LLM and scaling it up has so far not produced human-level AGI.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.