Yudkowsky wrote that, to the best of his ability to discern, there were no existing major works on the topic to cite as of January 2006.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “Yudkowsky wrote that, to the best of his ability to discern, there were no existing major works on the topic to cite as of January 2006.” (said 2008). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_7f38042d15b7, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_7f38042d15b7
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mixed
“I was observing that obvious-seeming hypothesis myself, sometime around the time of GPT 3.5.”
Yudkowsky himself observed the persona-selection-like hypothesis around the time of GPT 3.5.
-
Mostly true
“The test-passing preference stands on its own once formed.”
-
Mostly true
“LLMs surely have neural circuits they learned to model text streams from fictional and nonfictional personas that are not lying, deceiving, cheating.”
-
Mostly true
“The predict-as-if-honest circuitry is contextual, invoked to predict some streams of text but not others.”
-
Mostly true
“Presumably, somewhere along the way LLMs learn a dispreference for tests that don't pass, independently of how that gets prevented or whether the new plan does what the user really wanted.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.