Incidents similar to but less severe than the OAI-HF incident have happened across the AI industry, including at Anthropic.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
Whether incidents occurred inside AI companies, including Anthropic, is internal knowledge.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “Incidents similar to but less severe than the OAI-HF incident have happened across the AI industry, including at Anthropic.” (said 5 June 2025). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_7e32b57206f2, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_7e32b57206f2
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mostly true
“So we did this experiment where we basically train the model to be all the good thing, helpful, honest, harmless, friendly.”
Anthropic ran an experiment training a model to be helpful, honest, harmless and friendly.
-
Resolved true
“They're not yet at the stage where we think that there is a real and meaningful increase in the threat end to end,”
-
Resolved true
“10 to 25% referred to the chance of civilization getting substantially derailed, right?”
-
Mostly true
“this lack of understanding is essentially unprecedented in the history of technology.”
-
Mostly true
“We were able to provide a strong theoretical basis for having conviction that superposition was the right hypothesis to pursue.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.