The double descent test-error peak does not appear with multilayer neural networks because they are implicitly regularized.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
The claim gives a causal explanation of why the double-descent peak does not appear in multilayer nets, and the material available here has no evidence that settles whether implicit regularization is the reason.
Cite this claim
Yann LeCun, “The double descent test-error peak does not appear with multilayer neural networks because they are implicitly regularized.” (said 9 August 2020). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_7de0e13eeb6e, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_7de0e13eeb6e
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Yann LeCun
-
Mostly true
“The notions of partition functions, entropy, free energy, variational methods etc, that are so prevalent in the graphical models literature all come from statistical physics.”
-
Mostly true
“No one uses generalization bounds to do model selection.”
No one uses generalization bounds to do model selection; practitioners use cross-validation.
-
Resolved true
“The idea is rooted in Hubel and Wiesel’s classic 1962 work on the cat’s primary visual cortex.”
-
Resolved true
“This loss is always positive, since the second term is a lower bound on the first term.”
-
Resolved false
““Those agents are doing exactly what they’ve been asked to do,” LeCun said.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.