Anger over online censorship probably increased enthusiasm among right-leaning voters in the recent US election.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Hedged causal claim about voter enthusiasm is too vague to test.
Cite this claim
Marc Andreessen, “Anger over online censorship probably increased enthusiasm among right-leaning voters in the recent US election.” (said 26 January 2025). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_7bc6b313beed, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_7bc6b313beed
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Marc Andreessen
-
Mixed
“And the political donations in the Valley range from 90 to 99% to 1 side.”
Political donations in Silicon Valley go 90 to 99% to one party.
-
Mostly false
“And that’s one of the reasons why Trump won.”
Getting Amish voters to the polls was one of the reasons Trump won the 2024 election.
-
Mostly true
“So I’m a volunteer when helpful, but I’m not making the decisions, nor am I in a position to speak for the administration.”
-
Mostly true
“The constitution requires Congress to authorize money to be spent by the executive branch.”
The US Constitution requires Congress to authorize money to be spent by the executive branch.
-
Mostly true
“A president that doesn’t want to spend the money can’t not spend it.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.