Kurzweil told a Nobel-winning panelist that 100 years was a reasonable estimate of the technical progress needed for self-replicating nanoengineered entities, at the rate of progress then current.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
A private conversation with an unnamed panelist, known only through Kurzweil's account.
Cite this claim
Ray Kurzweil, “Kurzweil told a Nobel-winning panelist that 100 years was a reasonable estimate of the technical progress needed for self-replicating nanoengineered entities, at the rate of progress then current.” (said January 2001). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_7526f8f8c03d, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_7526f8f8c03d
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil
-
Mostly true
“Eighty years ago, we had 100 million people die in Europe and Asia through World War II.”
Eighty years ago, 100 million people died in Europe and Asia in World War II.
-
Resolved true
“and yet it hasn’t happened.”
-
Resolved true
“Analyses have shown that the detonation of an atomic bomb in a modern city could kill as many as 1 million people.”
-
Mostly false
“That was not true a year ago. But that’s true today.”
-
Resolved true
“In 1999, I predicted 2029 for AGI and I still predict 2029.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.