When buying Forest River, Warren Buffett asked Pete Liegl what his compensation should be and said he would accept whatever Liegl named.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
The evidence is the person's or their organisation's own records.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
Factual claim about Buffett's own conduct when Berkshire bought Forest River (2005). True: Berkshire records (shareholder letters, such as the 2005 letter or the 2025 letter) or accounts by Pete Liegl confirm that Buffett asked Liegl to name his own pay and committed in advance to accept it. Mostly true: the exchange is confirmed but a minor detail differs (for example its exact timing relative to the deal). Mixed: Buffett asked Liegl about pay, but the advance promise to accept whatever he named is not supported. Mostly false: the account is confirmed only in a materially different form (for example pay was negotiated). False: Liegl or other records directly contradict it.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 How Pete Liegl Named his Own Salary with Warren Buffett RV Business (RVBusiness), reprinting an excerpt of a Benzinga report by Jeanine Mancini · 28 January 2026
“"I asked Pete what his compensation should be, adding that whatever he said, I would accept," Buffett wrote.”
-
E2 How Pete Liegl Named his Own Salary with Warren Buffett RV Business (RVBusiness), reprinting an excerpt of a Benzinga report by Jeanine Mancini · 28 January 2026
“When the topic of salary came up, Buffett asked Liegl what he wanted to be paid and told him that whatever number he gave, he’d accept it.”
-
E3 How Pete Liegl Named his Own Salary with Warren Buffett RV Business (RVBusiness), reprinting an excerpt of a Benzinga report by Jeanine Mancini · 28 January 2026
“Liegl didn’t ask for millions. Instead, he requested $100,000 per year—the same salary Buffett took as Berkshire’s CEO for decades. Then he added a 10% bonus on profits above the current run rate.”
-
E4 How Pete Liegl Named his Own Salary with Warren Buffett RV Business (RVBusiness), reprinting an excerpt of a Benzinga report by Jeanine Mancini · 28 January 2026
“In his 2024 letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, Buffett shared the story of Pete Liegl”
Reasoning
E1, an RVBusiness reprint of a Benzinga report, quotes Buffett's letter to Berkshire shareholders: "I asked Pete what his compensation should be, adding that whatever he said, I would accept." E4 identifies the letter as the 2024 one, which is the kind of Berkshire record the criteria accept. E2 says Buffett asked Liegl what he wanted to be paid and told him he would accept whatever number he gave, and E3 says Liegl asked for $100,000 a year plus a 10% bonus on profits above the current run rate. The account comes from Buffett's own letter, relayed by an independent outlet, and none of the evidence contradicts it.
Cite this claim
Warren Buffett, “When buying Forest River, Warren Buffett asked Pete Liegl what his compensation should be and said he would accept whatever Liegl named.” (said 2025). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_746e0ee50804, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_746e0ee50804
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Warren Buffett
-
Resolved true
“Howard has been a Berkshire Director for 33 years.”
-
Resolved true
“My son, Howard, will succeed me as Chairman.”
Howard Buffett succeeds Warren Buffett as Berkshire's Chairman.
-
Resolved true
“I have served Berkshire since 1965.”
-
Mostly true
“She and her CNBC crew do a great job of both transmitting our meetings worldwide and archiving much Berkshire-related material.”
-
Resolved true
“I was lucky enough to get an education at three fine universities.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.