ClaimsDaniela Amodei

“It was following what was most interesting to me at the time, and the intersection of what was I good at, what was I interested in, and what was going to have a big impact in the world.”

Daniela Amodei 29 June 2026 Daniela Amodei Says Curiosity Is Underrated (Stanford GSB)

Not checkable

It was following what was most interesting to me at the time, and the intersection of what was I good at, what was I interested in, and…

Not checkable An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check.

Not checkable: An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check. Not scored.

Cite this claim

Daniela Amodei, “It was following what was most interesting to me at the time, and the intersection of what was I good at, what was I interested in, and…” (said 29 June 2026). Verdict: not checkable. Reliability API, claim c_731cd4d316e9, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_731cd4d316e9

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Daniela Amodei, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.