ClaimsEliezer Yudkowsky

“The second threat scenario is less vivid and alarming, but the defense is more useful because it is more vague.”

Eliezer Yudkowsky 2008 Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks (UC Berkeley (hosted))

Not checkable

The second threat scenario is less vivid and alarming, but the defense is more useful because it is more vague.

Not checkable An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check.

Not checkable: An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check. Not scored.

Cite this claim

Eliezer Yudkowsky, “The second threat scenario is less vivid and alarming, but the defense is more useful because it is more vague.” (said 2008). Verdict: not checkable. Reliability API, claim c_6f14eb22fca0, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6f14eb22fca0

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Eliezer Yudkowsky, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.