Productivity growth has slowed down.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2019-07-18, using US data (Cowen's usual frame) and comparing productivity growth in recent periods with earlier ones. True: official statistics (for example US BLS labour productivity or San Francisco Fed TFP) show average productivity growth in the period since about 2005 (or since 1973) clearly below the earlier benchmark period, such as 1995–2004 or 1947–1973. Mostly true: a slowdown is evident on most standard measures, with minor dispute over the period or the measure. Mixed: the measures disagree, with a slowdown on roughly half. Mostly false: a slowdown appears only in a narrow window or on one measure, while broader data do not show it. False: the data show productivity growth has not slowed or has accelerated relative to earlier periods.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 Does the United States have a Productivity Slowdown or a Measurement Problem Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FEDS Working Paper 2016-017), by David M. Byrne, John G. Fernald, and Marshall B. Reinsdorf · 1 March 2016
“After 2004, measured growth in labor productivity and total-factor productivity (TFP) slowed.”
-
E2 A Practitioner's Perspective on the Productivity Slowdown Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (speech by President Thomas I. Barkin) · 4 April 2019
“But since 2006, average annual labor productivity growth has been just 1.3 percent. In contrast, it averaged 2.3 percent between 1985 and 2005.”
-
E3 Does the United States have a Productivity Slowdown or a Measurement Problem Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FEDS Working Paper 2016-017), by David M. Byrne, John G. Fernald, and Marshall B. Reinsdorf · 1 March 2016
“About two-thirds of industries show a slowdown in measured TFP growth after 2004.”
Reasoning
A Federal Reserve Board staff paper reports that measured US labour productivity and total-factor productivity growth both slowed after 2004 (E1). It also finds the slowdown in about two-thirds of industries, so it is not confined to one sector (E4). In April 2019, a few months before the claim date, the Richmond Fed president said average annual labour productivity growth was 1.3 percent since 2006, against 2.3 percent over 1985–2005 (E3). The evidence shows that measured labour productivity and TFP growth slowed after 2004 [E1], with labour productivity growth averaging 1.3 percent since 2006 against 2.3 percent over 1985–2005 [E3], which meets the criteria for true.
Cite this claim
Tyler Cowen, “Productivity growth has slowed down.” (said 18 July 2019). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_6e379300a9ca, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6e379300a9ca
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Tyler Cowen
-
Mostly false
“The World Bank seems weaker in relative terms, more displaced by private capital markets.”
The World Bank seems weaker in relative terms, more displaced by private capital markets.
-
Mostly true
“There are some startups, but they’re not significant.”
In the university sector there are some startups, but they are not significant.
-
Mostly true
“He has a new book *How Africa Works*”
-
Mixed
“Both #1 (brain drain) and #2 have taken a hit in recent times.”
-
Mostly false
“They are also, in my view, the biggest reasons why the UK currently is in economic trouble.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.