Without Apple's rules and fees, Meta would make about twice as much profit, by Zuckerberg's rough calculation.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
It is Zuckerberg's rough private calculation of Meta's hypothetical profit, so no public record exists.
Cite this claim
Mark Zuckerberg, “Without Apple's rules and fees, Meta would make about twice as much profit, by Zuckerberg's rough calculation.” (said 10 January 2025). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_6d0a330fcd88, method 0.1.0+3f84d14d, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6d0a330fcd88
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Mark Zuckerberg
-
Resolved true
“Sales of our glasses more than tripled last year, and we think that they're some of the fastest-growing consumer electronics in history.”
-
Mixed
“Developers can run inference on Llama 3.1 405B on their own infra at roughly 50% the cost of using closed models like GPT-4o, for both user-facing and offline inference tasks.”
-
Resolved true
“One of my formative experiences has been building our services constrained by what Apple will let us build on their platforms.”
-
Mixed
“There’s just a lot of research that shows that people’s opportunities—social, economic, and otherwise—are generally pretty anchored to physically where they are.”
-
Mostly false
“So anytime it is recording, it’s flashing a very visible light.”
Meta's glasses flash a very visible light whenever they are recording.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.