If GiveWell influenced the same proportion of unattributed donations as attributed ones, it would have influenced an additional $20 million not in its headline money moved figure.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
It is a hypothetical extrapolation from GiveWell's internal attribution proportions.
Cite this claim
GiveWell, “If GiveWell influenced the same proportion of unattributed donations as attributed ones, it would have influenced an additional $20 million not in its headline money moved figure.” (said 2018). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_6a3fb2445ced, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_6a3fb2445ced
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by GiveWell
-
Mostly true
“GiveWell’s Cross-Cutting research subteam focuses on improving our grantmaking over time—it investigates the impact of the programs we fund, works to resolve our largest uncertainties, and…”
-
Resolved true
“That was our largest fundraising year to date, and we’re now preparing for the potential of a future at a substantially larger scale.”
GiveWell's 2025 fundraising of $616 million was its largest fundraising year to date.
-
Resolved true
“Around $124 million (29% of funds directed) went to our four Top Charities”
Around $124 million (29% of funds directed) in 2025 went to GiveWell's four Top Charities.
-
Resolved true
“In 2025, we directed around $427 million to high-impact programs and organizations. This represents an increase of 8% in funds directed compared to 2024.”
-
Mostly true
“Each spring, we share our plans for the year.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.