Anthropic conducts interpretability research aimed at seeing inside language models and understanding their workings.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2022-03-04. True if by that date Anthropic was conducting research aimed at understanding the internal workings of language models, shown by published papers, research posts or team descriptions (e.g. mechanistic interpretability work on transformers). Mostly true if such research was under way but its focus was slightly different from 'language models' (e.g. related neural network models). Mostly false if interpretability was only planned or announced with no work under way by that date. False if Anthropic had no interpretability research programme at that time.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 A Mathematical Framework for Transformer Circuits Transformer Circuits Thread (Anthropic) · 22 December 2021 Own record
“Transformer language models are an emerging technology that is gaining increasingly broad real-world use, for example in systems like GPT-3 , LaMDA , Codex , Meena , Gopher , and similar models.”
-
E2 A mathematical framework for Transformer Circuits Anthropic · 22 December 2021 Own record
“Reverse-engineering small attention-only transformers reveals how induction heads form via head composition.”
-
E3 Chris Olah Wiki: Co-founder at Anthropic | AI People Wiki AI People Wiki · 22 December 2021
“At Anthropic, Olah is the corresponding author of "A Mathematical Framework for Transformer Circuits" (2021), last-listed author of "Toy Models of Superposition" (2022)”
Reasoning
E1 and E2 are Anthropic's published paper "A Mathematical Framework for Transformer Circuits," dated 2021-12-22, before the judge-as-of date of 2022-03-04. In it Anthropic reverse-engineers small attention-only transformers to explain how induction heads form, and it frames the work around transformer language models. E3, an independent wiki, attributes this 2021 paper to Anthropic. Together they show interpretability research into the internals of language models was under way by the claim date.
Cite this claim
Daniela Amodei, “Anthropic conducts interpretability research aimed at seeing inside language models and understanding their workings.” (said 4 March 2022). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_648215898c62, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_648215898c62
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Daniela Amodei
-
Mostly true
“Because we have the information about how the technology can be abused, because we see it every day.”
-
Mostly true
“but we’re just not confident enough yet.”
-
Mostly true
“We have detailed, real-time knowledge of how technology can be misused because we see it in action every day”
-
Mostly true
“We developed a powerful new class of model that customers would love to use right away, but we felt we needed more time to ensure it was safe before wide release.”
-
Mostly true
“that’s why we chose not to release our latest model widely due to concerns about cyber misuse.”
Anthropic chose not to release its latest model widely because of concerns about cyber misuse.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.