Adjusted for impairment losses and provisions for onerous contracts, DONG Energy's ROCE was 6.8% in 2013 compared with -0.9% in 2012.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “Adjusted for impairment losses and provisions for onerous contracts, DONG Energy's ROCE was 6.8% in 2013 compared with -0.9% in 2012.” (said February 2014). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_64045f47fb9d, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_64045f47fb9d
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ørsted
-
Mostly true
“The increase was primarily driven by earnings from the construction agreement for Hornsea 3.”
-
Resolved true
“EBITDA excluding new partnerships and cancellation fees in our offshore business amounted to DKK 11.9 billion in the first half of 2026, compared with DKK 10.3 billion last year, primarily driven by…”
-
Resolved true
“Net profit for the period totalled DKK 2.6 billion. This was affected by non-cash tax effects and impairments due to the higher long-dated US interest rates.”
-
Resolved true
“At present, Ørsted operates 15.5 GW of renewable energy assets, while 4.9 GW are under construction across technologies.”
Ørsted currently operates 15.5 GW of renewable energy assets, with 4.9 GW under construction.
-
Resolved true
“was the first energy company in the world to have its science-based net-zero emissions target validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.