In Hassabis's opinion, the AI systems around at the time were not dangerous, but in a few years they might have the potential to be.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
Vague 'might' about danger potential 'in a few years', not testably defined.
Cite this claim
Demis Hassabis, “In Hassabis's opinion, the AI systems around at the time were not dangerous, but in a few years they might have the potential to be.” (said 28 February 2024). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_626a8cecac16, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_626a8cecac16
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Demis Hassabis
-
Resolved true
“I think fusion and solar are the two that I would bet on.”
-
Resolved true
“I think the next versions of this over the next year, 18 months, we’ll maybe have some contextual understanding of the environment around you through a camera or a phone or some glasses.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.