OpenAI's book-summarizing system combines reinforcement learning from human feedback and recursive task decomposition.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
Judged as of 2021-09-23. True: OpenAI's book-summarization publication (the blog post 'Summarizing Books with Human Feedback' and the paper 'Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedback', Wu et al. 2021) describes the system as using both reinforcement learning from human feedback and recursive task decomposition. Mostly true: both methods are used, but one is described in slightly different terms (for example behavioral cloning plus RL from human feedback). Mixed: only one of the two methods is used. Mostly false: neither method is central, though related techniques appear. False: the system uses neither method, or no such OpenAI system exists.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 Summarizing books with human feedback - OpenAI OpenAI · 23 September 2021 Own record
“Our approach: combining reinforcement learning from human feedback and recursive task decomposition”
-
E2 Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedback arXiv (ar5iv rendering) Own record
“Our method combines learning from human feedback with recursive task decomposition: we use models trained on smaller parts of the task to assist humans in giving feedback on the broader task.”
-
E3 Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedback arXiv (ar5iv rendering) Own record
“We train a single model to perform these tasks using standard cross-entropy behavioral cloning (BC) and reinforcement learning (RL) from human preferences (Christiano et al., 2017).”
-
E4 OpenAI unveils model that can summarize books of any length VentureBeat · 23 September 2021
“To create the model, OpenAI combined reinforcement learning with recursive task decomposition, which procedurally breaks up a difficult task (e.g., summarizing a long piece of text) into simpler, individual ones”
Reasoning
The criteria name OpenAI's own publication as the reference. The blog post, dated 2021-09-23, describes the approach as "combining reinforcement learning from human feedback and recursive task decomposition" (E1). The paper says the method combines learning from human feedback with recursive task decomposition, and that training uses behavioral cloning plus RL from human preferences (E2, E3). VentureBeat separately reported the same day that OpenAI combined reinforcement learning with recursive task decomposition (E4).
Cite this claim
Sam Altman, “OpenAI's book-summarizing system combines reinforcement learning from human feedback and recursive task decomposition.” (said 23 September 2021). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_61e7f892f4d8, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_61e7f892f4d8
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Sam Altman
-
Mostly true
“But for some users that had fragile mental states, it was encouraging delusions.”
For some users with fragile mental states, ChatGPT's sycophantic behaviour encouraged delusions.
-
Mostly true
“How we do it, we show the model examples of how we’d like it to respond in different cases, and from that it learns the sort of the overall personality.”
-
Mostly true
“we decided to talk about GPT-1, 2, 3, and 4.”
OpenAI chose to publicly discuss GPT-1, 2, 3 and 4 rather than build in secret until GPT-5.
-
Mostly true
“The very end of 2015, we announced it, and then the first day of work was like January of 2016.”
-
Mostly true
“not until 2020 did we train GPT-3, which was the first model that I think actually was over some threshold of usability.”
OpenAI trained GPT-3 in 2020, which Altman considers the first model above a threshold of usability.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.