DONG Energy's 2016 EBITDA from continuing operations was DKK 19.1 billion, underlying growth of 95%.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
True if DONG Energy's 2016 annual report shows EBITDA from continuing operations of DKK 19.1 billion (±0.05 billion) and underlying growth of 95%. Mostly true if the EBITDA figure matches and the growth figure is within a few percentage points of 95%. Mixed if one of the two figures is materially off. False if both figures are materially off.
Set before the research began.
Reasoning
No evidence with a verified quote was found apart from the claim's own source, so the claim was not judged.
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “DONG Energy's 2016 EBITDA from continuing operations was DKK 19.1 billion, underlying growth of 95%.” (said 2017). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_5ee15aeec015, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_5ee15aeec015
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ørsted
-
Mostly true
“The increase was primarily driven by earnings from the construction agreement for Hornsea 3.”
-
Resolved true
“EBITDA excluding new partnerships and cancellation fees in our offshore business amounted to DKK 11.9 billion in the first half of 2026, compared with DKK 10.3 billion last year, primarily driven by…”
-
Resolved true
“Net profit for the period totalled DKK 2.6 billion. This was affected by non-cash tax effects and impairments due to the higher long-dated US interest rates.”
-
Resolved true
“At present, Ørsted operates 15.5 GW of renewable energy assets, while 4.9 GW are under construction across technologies.”
Ørsted currently operates 15.5 GW of renewable energy assets, with 4.9 GW under construction.
-
Resolved true
“was the first energy company in the world to have its science-based net-zero emissions target validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.