The number one theme among struggling Andreessen Horowitz portfolio companies is that they do not charge enough for their product.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Pattern among a16z's struggling portfolio companies is internal knowledge.
Cite this claim
Marc Andreessen, “The number one theme among struggling Andreessen Horowitz portfolio companies is that they do not charge enough for their product.” (said 1 January 2018). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_5ecd1647f266, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_5ecd1647f266
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Marc Andreessen
-
Mixed
“And these people are completely giving up the entire moral foundation of the system that’s been built for them, which by the way, is paid for virtually 100% by taxpayer money.”
The system that has been built for these people is paid for virtually 100% by taxpayer money.
-
Mostly true
“I mean, look, we’re adding a trillion dollars to the national debt every 100 days right now, and it’s now passing the size of the Defense Department budget and it’s compounding”
-
Mixed
“Technological innovation in a market system is inherently philanthropic, by a 50:1 ratio.”
-
Mostly false
“There are only three sources of growth: population growth, natural resource utilization, and technology.”
-
Mostly true
“We believe markets lift people out of poverty – in fact, markets are by far the most effective way to lift vast numbers of people out of poverty, and always have been.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.