People who heard the slogan "defund the police" did not believe it meant something other than what it literally said.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
What listeners believed the slogan meant is a vague claim about the inner states of many people.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “People who heard the slogan "defund the police" did not believe it meant something other than what it literally said.” (said 11 November 2020). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_582bc2d6ab25, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_582bc2d6ab25
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mostly true
“but the process is not really open to human introspection.”
The process of visualizing a triangular light bulb is not really open to human introspection.
-
Mixed
“I was observing that obvious-seeming hypothesis myself, sometime around the time of GPT 3.5.”
Yudkowsky himself observed the persona-selection-like hypothesis around the time of GPT 3.5.
-
Mostly true
“The test-passing preference stands on its own once formed.”
-
Mostly true
“LLMs surely have neural circuits they learned to model text streams from fictional and nonfictional personas that are not lying, deceiving, cheating.”
-
Mostly true
“The predict-as-if-honest circuitry is contextual, invoked to predict some streams of text but not others.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.