Andreessen said the Twitter Files are a hundred percent representative of what he has seen at every other one of these companies, and that what happened at Twitter can be assumed to have happened at the others for the most part, certainly in terms of the kind of pressure they got.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Depends on Andreessen's private observations of pressure at other companies, not publicly documented.
Cite this claim
Marc Andreessen, “Andreessen said the Twitter Files are a hundred percent representative of what he has seen at every other one of these companies, and that what happened at Twitter can be assumed to have happened at the others for the most part, certainly in terms of the kind of pressure they got.” (said 26 January 2025). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_581dda3631fa, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_581dda3631fa
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Marc Andreessen
-
Mixed
“they basically were funded by the federal government to be third-party censorship operations.”
-
Mostly false
“The precautionary principle was developed by the German Greens in the 1970s”
The precautionary principle was developed by the German Greens in the 1970s.
-
Mixed
“they all correlate to the concept known as fluid intelligence, which is the ability to rapidly assimilate and synthesize knowledge and then use knowledge to solve problems.”
-
Mostly false
“we know for a fact that in human affairs, intelligence makes everything better.”
-
Mostly true
“Milton Friedman once said the great public sector mistake is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.