The likelihood of technologies destroying humanity has not increased.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
The likelihood of technologies destroying humanity has no measurable record; too vague to test.
Cite this claim
Ray Kurzweil, “The likelihood of technologies destroying humanity has not increased.” (said March 2025). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_55c225b8ca2e, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_55c225b8ca2e
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil
-
Mostly true
“Eighty years ago, we had 100 million people die in Europe and Asia through World War II.”
Eighty years ago, 100 million people died in Europe and Asia in World War II.
-
Resolved true
“and yet it hasn’t happened.”
-
Resolved true
“Analyses have shown that the detonation of an atomic bomb in a modern city could kill as many as 1 million people.”
-
Mostly false
“That was not true a year ago. But that’s true today.”
-
Resolved true
“In 1999, I predicted 2029 for AGI and I still predict 2029.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.