The check reading system LeCun and a colleague built at Bell Labs in the early 1990s used structured prediction on top of convolutional nets, called Graph Transformer Networks.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge said resolved true; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2016-07-28. True: published sources (e.g. LeCun, Bottou, Bengio & Haffner 1998, 'Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition', and related papers) show that the Bell Labs check-reading system developed in the early-to-mid 1990s combined convolutional nets with a structured-prediction layer called Graph Transformer Networks. Mostly true: as stated, except for a minor detail such as the dates (e.g. mid-1990s rather than early 1990s) or the number of collaborators. Mixed: the system used convnets, but GTNs were a separate or later development not used in it, or vice versa. Mostly false: the system existed but did not use structured prediction on convnets in the way described. False: no such Bell Labs check-reading system by LeCun existed.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 Yann LeCun - A.M. Turing Award Laureate ACM A.M. Turing Award · 1 January 2018
“As well as developing the convolutional approach, LeCun pioneered its application in “graph transformer networks” to recognize printed and handwritten text. This was used in a widely deployed system to read numbers written on checks, produced in the early 1990s in collaboration with Bengio, Leon Bottou and Patrick Haffner.”
-
E2 leon.bottou.org Léon Bottou (personal site hosting paper: Bottou, Le Cun, Bengio, CVPR 1997) · 1997 Own record
“A complete check reading system based on these concept is described. The system uses convolutional neural network character recognizers, combined with global training techniques to provides record accuracy on business and personal checks.”
-
E3 Gradient-based Learning Applied to Document Recognition Proceedings of the IEEE · November 1998 Own record
“A graph transformer network for reading a bank cheque is also described. It uses convolutional neural network character recognizers combined with global training techniques to provide record accuracy on business and personal cheques.”
Reasoning
The ACM Turing Award biography (E1), an independent source, says LeCun pioneered the application of the convolutional approach in "graph transformer networks", which was used in a widely deployed check-reading system produced in the early 1990s. It dates that system to the early 1990s. The 1998 Proceedings of the IEEE paper (E3) describes a graph transformer network for reading bank cheques, and the 1997 CVPR paper (E2) describes a check-reading system using convolutional character recognizers with global training techniques. It uses convolutional character recognizers with global training, which is a structured-prediction layer on top of convnets. The core claim holds, but E1 credits the work to LeCun with three collaborators (Bengio, Bottou and Haffner), not one colleague, so the verdict is mostly true.
Cite this claim
Yann LeCun, “The check reading system LeCun and a colleague built at Bell Labs in the early 1990s used structured prediction on top of convolutional nets, called Graph Transformer Networks.” (said 28 July 2016). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_4f9a162fcb6d, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_4f9a162fcb6d
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Yann LeCun
-
Mostly true
“For starters, transformers are equivariant to permutations.”
Transformers are equivariant to permutations, as ConvNets are equivariant to translations.
-
Mostly true
“If it were the case, we would have AI systems that could teach themselves to drive a car in 20 hours of practice, like any 17 year-old.”
-
Mostly true
“The architecture is good, the architecture of the encoder is good, but the fact that you train the system to reconstruct images does not lead it to produce to long, good generic features of images.”
-
Mostly true
“LLMs can do none of those or they can only do them in a very primitive way and they don’t really understand the physical world.”
-
Mostly true
“No, there’s one thing that autoregressive LLMs or that LLMs in general, not just the autoregressive one, but including the bird style bidirectional ones, are exploiting and its self supervised…”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.