Sexually reproducing organisms do not literally replicate themselves, because their offspring are composites of themselves and their mates rather than clones.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Cite this claim
Steven Pinker, “Sexually reproducing organisms do not literally replicate themselves, because their offspring are composites of themselves and their mates rather than clones.” (said 18 June 2012). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_49ff37a46dc2, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_49ff37a46dc2
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Steven Pinker
-
Mostly true
“The studies of human persuadability, malleability, show that there’s just so much unpredictability and chaos in a human that this may be a quixotic pursuit.”
-
Mostly true
“What they do is they coordinate on the full moon.”
-
Mixed
“So that’s an unresolved controversy in the cognitive psychology literature”
-
Mostly true
“Females on average perform better than males on a 'theory of mind' test across 57 countries.”
-
Resolved true
“John Ioannidis, among the savviest epidemiologists (his 2005 article alerted us to the replicability crisis)”
John Ioannidis published a 2005 article that alerted scientists to the replicability crisis.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.