ClaimsDario Amodei

“Vicarious to my knowledge, doesn’t think about safety.”

Dario Amodei, OpenAI researcher, interviewed 21 July 2017 Dario Amodei on OpenAI and how AI will change the world for good and ill (80,000 Hours) archived copy

Factual AI safety and alignment

Vicarious does not think about AI safety, to Amodei's knowledge.

Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

Reasoning

Depends on Amodei's private knowledge; Vicarious's views are hard to establish, though the claim is hedged.

Cite this claim

Dario Amodei, “Vicarious does not think about AI safety, to Amodei's knowledge.” (said 21 July 2017). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_44f13343addf, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_44f13343addf

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Dario Amodei, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Dario Amodei

  1. Mostly true Factual 28 February 2025
    “So we did this experiment where we basically train the model to be all the good thing, helpful, honest, harmless, friendly.”

    Anthropic ran an experiment training a model to be helpful, honest, harmless and friendly.

  2. Resolved true Factual 28 February 2025
    “They're not yet at the stage where we think that there is a real and meaningful increase in the threat end to end,”

    Anthropic assessed that Claude 3.7 Sonnet is not yet at a stage giving a real and meaningful end-to-end increase in dangerous threat capability.

  3. Resolved true Factual 28 February 2025
    “10 to 25% referred to the chance of civilization getting substantially derailed, right?”

    Amodei's earlier 10 to 25% figure referred to the chance of civilization getting substantially derailed.

  4. Mostly true Factual 18 February 2025
    “this lack of understanding is essentially unprecedented in the history of technology.”

    The lack of understanding of how AI systems work is essentially unprecedented in the history of technology.

  5. Mostly true Factual 18 February 2025
    “We were able to provide a strong theoretical basis for having conviction that superposition was the right hypothesis to pursue.”

    Amodei said that "we" were able to provide a strong theoretical basis for having conviction that superposition was the right hypothesis to pursue; the surrounding text does not say who "we" refers to.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.