In early studies, the quality of model-written clinical study reports was deemed comparable to that of the human process, which takes about ten weeks.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
The early studies' quality assessments are internal to Novo Nordisk and Anthropic.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “In early studies, the quality of model-written clinical study reports was deemed comparable to that of the human process, which takes about ten weeks.” (said 10 March 2025). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_40b24560484c, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_40b24560484c
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mixed
“It’s easy to dismiss this as a one-off or curiosity, but we’ve repeatedly seen a pattern where AI performance in new intellectual domains goes from weak to superhuman in a matter of a few years.”
-
Mixed
“we were measuring these trends back when models cost $1,000 or $10,000 to train”
Amodei's group measured AI scaling trends when models cost $1,000 or $10,000 to train.
-
Mixed
“a lot of the other reasoning models in the market are trained primarily on math and competition coding,”
-
Mostly true
“I do think AI coding is moving the fastest of all the other areas.”
Amodei said he thinks AI coding is moving the fastest of all the areas of AI.
-
Mostly true
“Because when it knows that it doesn't get any gain out of thinking further, it doesn't think for longer.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.