The figure given for PhD in Data Science is 47%.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Context missing: the statistic's meaning and source are undefined.
Cite this claim
Yann LeCun, “The figure given for PhD in Data Science is 47%.” (said 11 June 2019). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_35f4346458ec, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_35f4346458ec
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Yann LeCun
-
Mostly true
“Y.L. and Y.B. are CIFAR fellows.”
-
Resolved false
““Those agents are doing exactly what they’ve been asked to do,” LeCun said.”
-
Resolved true
““It’s AI for the physical world, so it’s not language-related,” LeCun said.”
AMI Labs' work is AI for the physical world and is not language-related.
-
Resolved true
““They were supposed to be in sandboxes, but the sandboxes were leaky and horribly designed.””
-
Resolved true
““It’s systems that understand the real world, like a manufacturing plant or turbojet engine.””
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.