Since August 2016, 61% of DONG Energy's sourced biomass has been certified as sustainable.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
The share of its own sourced biomass that is certified is an internal figure, though it may appear in its own reports.
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “Since August 2016, 61% of DONG Energy's sourced biomass has been certified as sustainable.” (said 2017). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_359a493165b9, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_359a493165b9
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ørsted
-
Mostly true
“The increase was primarily driven by earnings from the construction agreement for Hornsea 3.”
-
Resolved true
“EBITDA excluding new partnerships and cancellation fees in our offshore business amounted to DKK 11.9 billion in the first half of 2026, compared with DKK 10.3 billion last year, primarily driven by…”
-
Resolved true
“Net profit for the period totalled DKK 2.6 billion. This was affected by non-cash tax effects and impairments due to the higher long-dated US interest rates.”
-
Resolved true
“At present, Ørsted operates 15.5 GW of renewable energy assets, while 4.9 GW are under construction across technologies.”
Ørsted currently operates 15.5 GW of renewable energy assets, with 4.9 GW under construction.
-
Resolved true
“was the first energy company in the world to have its science-based net-zero emissions target validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.