There was a lot of political instability in the western world in the year before July 2017.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge said resolved true; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2017-07-21, for the period from about July 2016 to July 2017. True: credible sources describe significant political instability or upheaval in Western countries during that period (e.g. the aftermath of the Brexit vote, the 2016 US election and its turmoil, the rise of populist movements, the UK's 2017 hung parliament). Mostly true: there was notable upheaval, but 'instability' overstates it for most Western countries. Mixed: there were real but limited disruptions, and commentators disagree on whether this counts as instability. Mostly false: there were only isolated events, presented as broad instability. False: the period was broadly politically calm in Western democracies.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 2017’s Verdict on European Populism Carnegie Endowment for International Peace · 20 December 2017
“A year ago, many observers feared that the eruption of populism that contributed to Brexit and the election of U.S. President Donald Trump would continue to spread uncontrollably across Europe.”
-
E2 2017’s Verdict on European Populism Carnegie Endowment for International Peace · 20 December 2017
“One clear exception to this trend is the surprising gains of Jeremy Corbyn’s Labor Party in the UK’s general snap election in June 2017, where the party won 40 percent of the votes, just shy of the Conservative’s 42.4 percent.”
-
E3 2017’s Verdict on European Populism Carnegie Endowment for International Peace · 20 December 2017
“However, with the so-called European super-election year now over—following elections in key states such as France, Germany, Great Britain, and the Netherlands—it is safe to say that the continent weathered the populist challenge better than expected.”
Reasoning
E1, an independent Carnegie analysis, describes an 'eruption of populism' that contributed to Brexit and to Donald Trump's election, and says observers feared it would spread across Europe. That points to significant upheaval in Western politics during the period. E2 reports a surprisingly close result in the UK's June 2017 snap election. E3 adds that continental Europe 'weathered the populist challenge better than expected' in its 2017 elections, which suggests that 'instability' overstates the situation in several Western countries.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “There was a lot of political instability in the western world in the year before July 2017.” (said 21 July 2017). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_3307066f443e, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_3307066f443e
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mostly true
“the public has a negative view of AI”
-
Mixed
“People outside the field are often surprised and alarmed to learn that we do not understand how our own AI creations work.”
-
Mixed
“It’s easy to dismiss this as a one-off or curiosity, but we’ve repeatedly seen a pattern where AI performance in new intellectual domains goes from weak to superhuman in a matter of a few years.”
-
Mostly false
“As we’ve demonstrated today, humans can collaborate with AI to perform the experiments, validate key results in a few weeks and, if necessary, work with the AI to iterate on what they find.”
-
Resolved true
“I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.