ClaimsØrsted

“The Group generated DKK 73 billion (EUR 9.8 billion) in revenue in 2013.”

DONG Energy (Ørsted), company boilerplate February 2014 Announcement of financial results for 2013 - Improved earnings and strengthened capital base (Ørsted (DONG Energy)) archived copy

Factual Their own work or organisation

The DONG Energy Group generated DKK 73 billion (EUR 9.8 billion) in revenue in 2013.

Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.

What would count as true or false

True if DONG Energy's 2013 annual report states group revenue of about DKK 73 billion, rounding to 73. Mostly true if the reported figure is within about ±3% of DKK 73 billion, or the EUR conversion is slightly off. Mixed if revenue deviates by 3–10%. Mostly false if it deviates by 10–20%. False if it deviates by more than 20%.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (2)

  1. E1 [PDF] CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DONG Energy / Ørsted (DONG Energy Annual Report 2014) Own record

    “73,105”
  2. E2 ANNUAL REPORT 2013 DONG Energy · 5 February 2014 Own record

    “Revenue, DKK billion (%)1, 2”

Reasoning

E1, the comparative column of DONG Energy's 2014 consolidated financial statements, gives 2013 revenue of DKK 73,105 million on a business performance basis and DKK 72,199 million under IFRS. Both are within about 1% of DKK 73 billion, and DKK 73.1 billion converts to roughly EUR 9.8 billion. E2, the 2013 annual report itself, was garbled and showed no consolidated total, but the criteria point to the company's own reported figure, which E1 confirms.

Cite this claim

Ørsted, “The DONG Energy Group generated DKK 73 billion (EUR 9.8 billion) in revenue in 2013.” (said February 2014). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_2b7e94f06321, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_2b7e94f06321

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Ørsted, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Ørsted

  1. Mostly true Factual 13 August 2026
    “The increase was primarily driven by earnings from the construction agreement for Hornsea 3.”

    Ørsted's Q2 2026 offshore EBITDA increase (DKK 4.4 billion vs DKK 4.0 billion) was primarily driven by earnings from the Hornsea 3 construction agreement.

  2. Resolved true Factual 13 August 2026
    “EBITDA excluding new partnerships and cancellation fees in our offshore business amounted to DKK 11.9 billion in the first half of 2026, compared with DKK 10.3 billion last year, primarily driven by…”

    Ørsted's offshore EBITDA excluding new partnerships and cancellation fees was DKK 11.9 billion in H1 2026 versus DKK 10.3 billion in H1 2025, primarily driven by higher wind speeds and higher prices.

  3. Resolved true Factual 6 May 2026
    “Net profit for the period totalled DKK 2.6 billion. This was affected by non-cash tax effects and impairments due to the higher long-dated US interest rates.”

    Ørsted's net profit for Q1 2026 was DKK 2.6 billion, affected by non-cash tax effects and impairments due to higher long-dated US interest rates.

  4. Resolved true Factual 7 June 2023
    “At present, Ørsted operates 15.5 GW of renewable energy assets, while 4.9 GW are under construction across technologies.”

    Ørsted currently operates 15.5 GW of renewable energy assets, with 4.9 GW under construction.

  5. Resolved true Factual 7 June 2023
    “was the first energy company in the world to have its science-based net-zero emissions target validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)”

    Ørsted was the first energy company in the world to have its science-based net-zero emissions target validated by the Science Based Targets initiative.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.