Nick Clegg, Facebook's VP of global affairs and communications, wrote an op-ed about the future of the Internet.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge said resolved true; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2019-06-25. True: Nick Clegg held the post of Facebook's VP of Global Affairs and Communications at that date, and before or on that date he wrote a published op-ed on the future of the Internet or its regulation (e.g. in a major newspaper in June 2019). Mostly true: the op-ed exists but the title is slightly off, or the topic is closely related (e.g. internet regulation). Mostly false: Clegg held the post but the op-ed was not by him or was on a different topic, or it was published after the claim date. False: no such op-ed by Clegg existed by that date and he did not hold the role. ("Important" is opinion and is not tested.)
Set before the research began.
Evidence (2)
-
E1 ‘Big itself isn’t bad’: Facebook fires back at co-founder calling for social giant to break up - National | Globalnews.ca Globalnews.ca · 11 May 2019
“Facebook’s vice president for global affairs and communications, Nick Clegg, took aim at Hughes in The New York Times on Sunday.”
-
E2 ‘Big itself isn’t bad’: Facebook fires back at co-founder calling for social giant to break up - National | Globalnews.ca Globalnews.ca · 11 May 2019
““Fixing these problems requires significant resources — and strong new rules,” he wrote.”
Reasoning
Global News identifies Nick Clegg as Facebook's vice president for global affairs and communications as of May 2019 (E1). It also reports that he wrote a New York Times piece published before the claim date. That piece says fixing "these problems" requires "significant resources — and strong new rules" (E2). The piece responded to Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes, who had called for breaking up Facebook (E1), and called for strong new rules (E2), which is closely related to the future of the Internet. The evidence shows Clegg held the post and wrote a New York Times op-ed before the claim date that called for strong new rules (E1, E2); it gives only limited detail of the piece's topic, so under the criteria the claim is mostly true.
Cite this claim
Yann LeCun, “Nick Clegg, Facebook's VP of global affairs and communications, wrote an op-ed about the future of the Internet.” (said 25 June 2019). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_227837f171d1, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_227837f171d1
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Yann LeCun
-
Resolved true
“Nice defense of AI open science and open source by @ClementDelangue in his congressional testimony.”
Clément Delangue defended AI open science and open source in his congressional testimony.
-
Mostly true
“Yes, the protection of individual privacy is mentioned.”
-
Resolved false
““Those agents are doing exactly what they’ve been asked to do,” LeCun said.”
-
Resolved true
““It’s AI for the physical world, so it’s not language-related,” LeCun said.”
AMI Labs' work is AI for the physical world and is not language-related.
-
Resolved true
““They were supposed to be in sandboxes, but the sandboxes were leaky and horribly designed.””
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.