In Amodei's view, technical mitigations such as interpretability, robust classifiers and the ability to generate evidence of bad model behavior and sometimes correct it have been a little better.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Subjective judgment relative to his private expectations, so no record can settle it.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “In Amodei's view, technical mitigations such as interpretability, robust classifiers and the ability to generate evidence of bad model behavior and sometimes correct it have been a little better.” (said 28 February 2025). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_1942618b9c8f, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_1942618b9c8f
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mostly true
“So we did this experiment where we basically train the model to be all the good thing, helpful, honest, harmless, friendly.”
Anthropic ran an experiment training a model to be helpful, honest, harmless and friendly.
-
Resolved true
“They're not yet at the stage where we think that there is a real and meaningful increase in the threat end to end,”
-
Resolved true
“10 to 25% referred to the chance of civilization getting substantially derailed, right?”
-
Mostly true
“this lack of understanding is essentially unprecedented in the history of technology.”
-
Mostly true
“We were able to provide a strong theoretical basis for having conviction that superposition was the right hypothesis to pursue.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.