The announcement does not change Ørsted's financial outlook for 2021 or the expected investment level announced for 2021.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
True if Ørsted's 2021 financial outlook (EBITDA guidance) and expected 2021 investment level stated after the 2021-06-02 announcement were unchanged from those in force immediately before it, with no revision attributed to the announced matter. Mostly true if guidance was unchanged but a minor wording or classification change occurred that is unrelated to the announcement. Mixed if one of the two (outlook or investment level) was changed because of the announcement and the other was not. Mostly false if both were adjusted shortly afterwards partly due to the announced matter. False if the announcement itself or a direct consequence revised either guidance figure at that time.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (1)
-
E1 Company announcement Ørsted · 9 June 2021 Own record
“The information provided in this announcement doesn’t change Ørsted’s guidance for the financial year 2021. As previously communicated, the expected investment level for 2021 will increase with the purchase price.”
Reasoning
The only evidence, E1, is Ørsted's own 9 June 2021 announcement about completing the Brookfield Renewable Ireland acquisition. It says 2021 guidance is unchanged and that the 2021 investment level will rise with the purchase price 'as previously communicated'. E1 does not identify the 2 June 2021 announcement or say whether any change in outlook or investment level came from it. It is also not independent of the subject, so the evidence cannot settle whether the guidance figures in force before 2 June stayed unchanged because of that announcement.
Cite this claim
Ørsted, “The announcement does not change Ørsted's financial outlook for 2021 or the expected investment level announced for 2021.” (said 2 June 2021). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_14c97bf71bc7, method 0.1.0+7831dd9d, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_14c97bf71bc7
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ørsted
-
Mostly true
“The increase was primarily driven by earnings from the construction agreement for Hornsea 3.”
-
Resolved true
“EBITDA excluding new partnerships and cancellation fees in our offshore business amounted to DKK 11.9 billion in the first half of 2026, compared with DKK 10.3 billion last year, primarily driven by…”
-
Resolved true
“Net profit for the period totalled DKK 2.6 billion. This was affected by non-cash tax effects and impairments due to the higher long-dated US interest rates.”
-
Resolved true
“At present, Ørsted operates 15.5 GW of renewable energy assets, while 4.9 GW are under construction across technologies.”
Ørsted currently operates 15.5 GW of renewable energy assets, with 4.9 GW under construction.
-
Resolved true
“was the first energy company in the world to have its science-based net-zero emissions target validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.