Probabilistic models must be properly normalized, which sometimes requires evaluating intractable integrals over all possible variable configurations.
Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Cite this claim
Yann LeCun, “Probabilistic models must be properly normalized, which sometimes requires evaluating intractable integrals over all possible variable configurations.” (said 2006). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_030f1d3fb2e8, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_030f1d3fb2e8
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Yann LeCun
-
Mostly true
“The notions of partition functions, entropy, free energy, variational methods etc, that are so prevalent in the graphical models literature all come from statistical physics.”
-
Mostly true
“No one uses generalization bounds to do model selection.”
No one uses generalization bounds to do model selection; practitioners use cross-validation.
-
Resolved true
“The idea is rooted in Hubel and Wiesel’s classic 1962 work on the cat’s primary visual cortex.”
-
Resolved true
“This loss is always positive, since the second term is a lower bound on the first term.”
-
Resolved false
““Those agents are doing exactly what they’ve been asked to do,” LeCun said.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.