Anthropic was the first AI company to have a responsible scaling policy.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
Judged as of 2025-03-10. True: Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy (published September 2023) was the first such policy formally adopted by an AI company, with no other AI developer publishing an equivalent capability-threshold safety framework before it. Mostly true: Anthropic was the first company to adopt a policy under the "responsible scaling policy" name, but the concept was developed jointly with or first proposed by a non-company group such as ARC Evals/METR. Mixed: another company adopted a substantially similar framework at about the same time, so priority is unclear. Mostly false: another AI company adopted a comparable capability-threshold scaling framework earlier, even though Anthropic was first with that exact name. False: another company had published a policy called a responsible scaling policy before Anthropic.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 Common Elements of Frontier AI Safety Policies, March 2025 METR · March 2025
“This concept was initially introduced by METR in 2023, and the first such policy was piloted in September of that year.”
-
E2 Introducing Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy Anthropic · 19 September 2023 Own record
“We also recognize ARC Evals' leadership in originating and spearheading the development of their broader ARC Responsible Scaling Policy framework, which inspired our approach.”
-
E3 Introducing Anthropic's Responsible Scaling Policy Anthropic · 19 September 2023 Own record
“Today, we’re publishing our Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) – a series of technical and organizational protocols that we’re adopting to help us manage the risks of developing increasingly capable AI systems.”
-
E4 Responsible Scaling Policies — AI Glossary | Launchpad Library Launchpad Library · 8 October 2026
“The term was promoted by the evaluation group ARC Evals (now METR) in September 2023, the same month Anthropic, led by Dario Amodei, published the first policy under that name.”
Reasoning
METR, which is independent of Anthropic, says it introduced the frontier safety policy concept in 2023 and that the first such policy was piloted in September 2023 (E1). Anthropic published its Responsible Scaling Policy that month (E3), and a third-party glossary says Anthropic published the first policy under that name (E4). Anthropic's own announcement credits ARC Evals (now METR) with originating the broader Responsible Scaling Policy framework (E2). This matches the "mostly true" criterion: Anthropic was the first company to adopt a policy with this name, but a non-company group first proposed the concept.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “Anthropic was the first AI company to have a responsible scaling policy.” (said 10 March 2025). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_02a932cd4591, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_02a932cd4591
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mixed
“Similarly, the “Pacing the Frontier” letter envisions (or at least Anthropic’s preferred implementation of it envisions) modulating the pace of the very best models while not constraining those who…”
-
Mixed
“This contrasts with six months ago when most of the industry was still pushing for preemption of all state regulation and no apparent federal approach either.”
-
Mostly true
“Anthropic actually has been the most lean forward of all the AI companies in working with the U.S. government and working with the U.S. military.”
-
Mostly true
“all we've received is a tweet. We haven't received an actual supply chain desig-- you know, there's -- there's been no actual action by the government.”
-
Mostly true
“The whole timeline has been driven by the Department of War, not by us.”
The whole timeline of the dispute was driven by the Department of War, not Anthropic.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.