ClaimsMarc Andreessen

“But even in San Francisco, there was a big shift to the right in the voting in ’24.”

Marc Andreessen, podcast guest 26 January 2025 Transcript for Marc Andreessen: Trump, Power, Tech, AI, Immigration & Future of America (Lex Fridman) archived copy

Factual AI policy and governance

San Francisco voting shifted markedly to the right in the 2024 election.

Not researched Checkable, but outside the sample that was researched.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

Cite this claim

Marc Andreessen, “San Francisco voting shifted markedly to the right in the 2024 election.” (said 26 January 2025). Verdict: not researched. Reliability API, claim c_02a2ffba93a2, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_02a2ffba93a2

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Marc Andreessen, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Marc Andreessen

  1. Mixed Factual 26 January 2025
    “And the political donations in the Valley range from 90 to 99% to 1 side.”

    Political donations in Silicon Valley go 90 to 99% to one party.

  2. Mostly false Factual 26 January 2025
    “And that’s one of the reasons why Trump won.”

    Getting Amish voters to the polls was one of the reasons Trump won the 2024 election.

  3. Mostly true Factual 26 January 2025
    “So I’m a volunteer when helpful, but I’m not making the decisions, nor am I in a position to speak for the administration.”

    Marc Andreessen is a volunteer for the Trump administration when helpful, does not make its decisions and cannot speak for it.

  4. Mostly true Factual 26 January 2025
    “The constitution requires Congress to authorize money to be spent by the executive branch.”

    The US Constitution requires Congress to authorize money to be spent by the executive branch.

  5. Mostly true Factual 26 January 2025
    “A president that doesn’t want to spend the money can’t not spend it.”

    Under the current interpretation of appropriations, a president who does not want to spend appropriated money cannot decline to spend it.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.